How Marketing and Sales Can Work Together

Today’s U.S. Department of Agriculture

Marketing and sales work well together when they agree in writing on what a qualified lead is, share at least one revenue goal, hand leads over with full context and review results together on a fixed schedule. Most friction between the two teams comes from how the handoff is designed, not from either team doing its job badly.

This is for marketing leaders, sales managers and founders who keep hearing "the leads are bad" from one side and "sales never follows up" from the other, and want a practical fix.

Key takeaways

  • Write down a shared definition of a qualified lead and review it every quarter.
  • Give both teams at least one shared metric, such as pipeline created or revenue closed.
  • Make lead history visible in the CRM so reps never start from zero.
  • Close the loop: sales records why leads won or lost, and marketing acts on it.
  • Build content from the questions buyers actually ask sales.

Why do marketing and sales drift apart?

The split is old and partly sensible. Marketing works at scale: campaigns, brand, demand across a large audience. Sales works one to one: conversations, objections, specific deals. Different rhythms, different skills, different people. In their well-known Harvard Business Review article "Ending the War Between Sales and Marketing," Philip Kotler, Neil Rackham and Suj Krishnaswamy described two sources of strain: economic, from splitting one budget between two functions, and cultural, from the functions attracting different kinds of people who work in different ways.

Measurement makes it worse. If marketing is judged on lead volume and sales on closed revenue, both can hit their numbers while the business misses its target. The leads that never turn into revenue belong to nobody.

Buyer behavior adds pressure. B2B buyers often research on their own long before they talk to a rep, so marketing content shapes more of the decision than it used to. If the two teams don't coordinate, that influence goes unmeasured. Our piece on why content marketing matters for B2B companies covers that shift in more detail.

How do you agree on what a qualified lead is?

This is the most useful single exercise. It sounds obvious, but many companies have never written it down. Marketing sends what it thinks sales wants, and sales rejects leads for reasons it has never stated.

CRM tools already separate the stages. HubSpot's default lifecycle stages, for example, distinguish a marketing qualified lead (MQL), which marketing has vetted as ready for sales, from a sales qualified lead (SQL), which sales has judged to be a potential customer. The point is that each stage has an owner. Your job is to agree on the criteria for moving between them.

Run a working session with both teams and answer these questions in writing:

  1. Fit: which company size, industry, region and existing systems make an account a realistic prospect?
  2. Role: which job titles can buy or strongly influence the purchase?
  3. Intent: which actions signal real interest, such as a pricing page visit, a demo request or a reply to an email?
  4. Readiness: what separates "send to sales now" from "keep nurturing"?
  5. Rejection: what reasons can sales give for sending a lead back, and what happens next?

Both leaders sign it off, and you review it each quarter. Lead scoring and routing in your marketing automation or CRM can then apply the rules automatically, but automation only works if the definition underneath it is solid.

Should marketing and sales share revenue targets?

Yes, at least partly. When both teams carry a shared number, such as pipeline generated or revenue closed from target accounts, the incentives line up. Neither team can win while the other fails.

Keep team metrics as well. Marketing still needs reach, engagement and conversion by stage. Sales still needs activity, deal velocity and win rates. Add the shared layer on top. Account-based marketing makes this easier, because both teams work the same list of target accounts and success is clearly joint. Sales managers play a large part here; our article on sales management strategies that drive performance looks at how managers set and coach to those goals.

What makes a good lead handoff?

The handoff is where alignment usually breaks. Marketing marks a lead qualified, a rep gets a name and an email address, and starts from scratch, asking questions the prospect already answered on a form. The buyer is annoyed and marketing's groundwork is wasted.

A good handoff carries context. When a lead reaches a rep, the CRM record should show what the person downloaded, which pages they visited, which emails they opened and which events they attended. If your CRM can't show that without switching tools, it's worth reviewing; see seven CRM features to check before you buy.

Handoff checklist:

  • Agree a response time for new sales qualified leads, and report on it.
  • Show activity history on the CRM record by default.
  • Include a one-line note on why the lead qualified.
  • Where marketing has had real contact, send a short personal introduction to the rep rather than a cold first touch.
  • Define what happens if the rep can't reach the lead after a set number of attempts.

How often should the two teams review results together?

Teams that work well together usually hold a joint pipeline review every week or two. It looks at both ends: what marketing generated, what sales converted, where leads stall and what each team will change.

The tone matters. The question isn't "whose fault is this" but "what is the pipeline telling us." Marketing might learn that one channel brings in leads that look good but rarely close, so it shifts budget. Sales might learn that one case study keeps coming up in deals that win, so reps use it earlier.

None of this works without closed-loop data. Reps have to record outcomes and loss reasons consistently, or marketing has nothing to learn from. A common mistake we see is a loss-reason field with fifteen vague options that reps pick at random. Five clear options, used every time, beat fifteen fuzzy ones.

How should content support sales?

Marketing's most useful contribution to a live deal is often content: case studies, comparisons, implementation guides, cost calculators. It only helps if reps know it exists and trust it.

Make the feedback run both ways. Sales tells marketing which questions and objections come up in calls. Marketing treats those as content briefs. Then keep a shared library organized by buying stage and role, and brief reps on each new piece in a short live session, not just an email with a link. If you're hiring for this, our guide on what to look for when hiring a content marketer covers the skills that matter.

What structure helps?

Some companies add a revenue operations function that owns the CRM, routing rules, shared reporting and lead definitions, and acts as a neutral broker when the teams disagree. Others put marketing and sales under one revenue leader. Both can work. What rarely works is two fully separate functions reporting to different executives with no shared goal.

Shared systems help regardless of structure: one CRM, marketing automation connected to sales sequences and one set of dashboards. Tools don't fix alignment on their own, but teams on separate systems with incompatible data struggle to cooperate even when they want to.

When this does not apply: very early companies where one founder does both jobs don't need formal service levels yet. A shared spreadsheet and a weekly conversation are enough until you have dedicated people on each side.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between an MQL and an SQL?

A marketing qualified lead has been vetted by marketing as ready for sales based on agreed fit and engagement signals. A sales qualified lead has been reviewed by sales and judged to be a real potential customer. The key difference is who makes the call. Writing down the criteria for each stage stops most arguments about lead quality.

Who should own lead scoring?

Marketing usually builds and maintains the scoring model, but sales should help define it and approve changes. A joint owner, often revenue or marketing operations, keeps the rules current. Review scores against actual outcomes every quarter: if high-scoring leads aren't converting, the model needs adjusting, not more volume.

How long does it take to align marketing and sales?

The first wins can come within a quarter: a written lead definition, a handoff checklist and a recurring joint review. Changing goals, compensation and reporting usually takes longer, often a full planning cycle, because it touches budgets and targets. Start with the definition and the review meeting, since they cost little.

What to do next

  • Book a working session to write down your MQL and SQL criteria.
  • Pick one metric both teams will report on together this quarter.
  • Check three recent leads in your CRM: could a rep see their full history?
  • Start a 30-minute joint pipeline review every two weeks.

Sources

Last reviewed: October 2026.

Comments

Popular Posts

Why Workday Onboarding Breaks Down for Frontline Employees

Interview Tips for Beginners: A Step-by-Step Prep Plan

How to Improve the Customer Experience (CX)

How to Market Your Handyman Services to Small Business Owners

Are Biometrics Better Than Passwords? What NIST Says

Are Mobile Apps Tracking Your Every Move? How to Check

Predictive Scheduling Laws: Where They Apply and How to Comply

Boss Retaliation and False Accusations: Protect Yourself

Dollar General Store Walkout: Lessons for Retail HR

How Do I Log In and Sign In to Workday HCM