The management of third-party risks, often known as TPRM, is an essential component of healthcare cybersecurity. Since a growing number of healthcare providers depend on third-party vendors for technological solutions and services, these providers have a growing responsibility to guarantee that these suppliers adhere to stringent cybersecurity requirements. The TPRM procedure might be difficult, but it is very necessary to keep sensitive patient data from being compromised by cyberattacks. In the following paragraphs, we will go over some of the difficulties that healthcare providers encounter when it comes to controlling the risks posed by third parties, as well as some potential solutions.
Lack of visibility
The lack of insight into the systems and procedures of third-party vendors is one of the most significant difficulties associated with TPRM. It is possible that healthcare practitioners may not have direct access to the systems provided by third-party vendors, which might make it difficult to assess the level of security provided by these systems. It is possible that some suppliers may not divulge the specifics of their security procedures, which will make it even more difficult to evaluate the risk posed by them.
In order to overcome this obstacle, healthcare providers should ask their suppliers to do routine security assessments on their systems. These audits may assist providers in gaining insight into the security procedures of their vendors and in determining whether or not any vulnerabilities exist that need attention.
You might also like to read: Top 5 EHR Solutions and Their Pros and Cons
Compliance requirements
Protecting patient information is a requirement imposed on healthcare providers by a number of legislation and standards, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). It is also the responsibility of third-party vendors to adhere to these norms and standards; yet, healthcare providers may not always have the resources necessary to verify that their suppliers are fulfilling the necessary criteria.
In order to overcome this obstacle, healthcare providers may demand that third-party suppliers give documentation that they are in compliance with the applicable legislation and standards. In addition, providers have the ability to request periodical audits of the security processes of vendors in order to guarantee continuous compliance.
Lack of available resources
It is possible for healthcare practitioners to have limited resources to spend to TPRM, especially if the companies they work for are small or medium in size. If providers do not have access to appropriate resources, they may find it difficult to undertake in-depth risk evaluations of third-party vendors.
Automating some steps of the TPRM process may be accomplished via the use of technological solutions by healthcare providers as a means of overcoming this obstacle. For instance, they may use software tools in order to carry out risk assessments or monitor the security performance of vendors.
You might also like to read: North Korean Ransomware Attacks in Healthcare: The Growing Threat and How to Protect Against It
Altering contours of the danger landscape
As a result of the ever-shifting nature of the cybersecurity threat environment, healthcare providers are required to make adjustments to their TPRM plans in order to maintain compliance. There is the potential for the emergence of new classes of cyberattacks, as well as an increase in the severity of current vulnerabilities.
In order to overcome this obstacle, healthcare providers should ensure that they are current with the most recent developments in cybersecurity and integrate this information into their TPRM strategy. Providers should also engage closely with third-party suppliers to ensure that they are aware of possible risks and are taking action to reduce them. This can be accomplished by establishing good working relationships between the parties.
Communication and teamwork are essential
For TPRM to be effective, it is necessary for healthcare providers and third-party suppliers to communicate with one another and work together. Nonetheless, communication may be difficult, and this is especially the case when providers are collaborating with numerous vendors at the same time or when suppliers are situated in various geographic locations.
In order for healthcare providers to overcome this obstacle, they should create clear expectations for their suppliers about frequent contact and cooperation, as well as establish clear channels of communication with their vendors. To further simplify communication and cooperation, service providers may also make use of technological solutions such as platforms for encrypted texting.
You might also like to read: North Korean Ransomware Attacks in Healthcare: The Growing Threat and How to Protect Against It
In conclusion, TPRM is an essential component of the cybersecurity of the healthcare industry. Since a growing number of healthcare providers depend on third-party vendors for technological solutions and services, these providers have a growing responsibility to guarantee that these suppliers adhere to stringent cybersecurity requirements. Lack of visibility, compliance requirements, restricted resources, a shifting threat environment, communication and teamwork, and limited resources are some of the issues associated with TPRM. These obstacles may be solved by healthcare providers demanding frequent security assessments, seeking proof of compliance, using technological solutions, remaining current with changes in cybersecurity, and having clear communication channels with their suppliers. Protecting sensitive patient data and ensuring the dependability of their information technology systems is made possible for healthcare providers that place a priority on TPRM.
One thought on “Handling Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Challenges In Healthcare”